Explicit Meaning tutorial
Learn how to review Explicit Meaning results.
This service is in development. Live exercises below use your account and the deployed development contracts. Independent engine qualification is unfinished.
- Start with a short passage. Identify the people, action, conditions and exceptions you want to review.
- Compare each restatement with the source. If several readings change what someone could do, keep them separate.
- Answer a clarification only when you know the intended meaning. Accept a restatement only after reviewing it; acceptance does not authorize an action.
Try a live exercise
In development: results cover a narrow fragment and independent qualification is unfinished.
Checking account…
Read an example
Written by hand to illustrate the result, not a live or measured output.
You send
- Policy
- Managers may approve refunds over $500 only after a second review, except for enterprise accounts.
You get
- Statement 1
- A manager may approve a refund of more than $500 only after a second review of that refund is complete.
- Statement 2
- The second-review condition does not apply to refunds on enterprise accounts.
- Status
- ambiguous — two readings differ
- Clarify
- For an enterprise account, may a manager approve a refund over $500 without a second review — or is that refund outside this rule entirely?
You send
- Action
- send_email(to: "all-customers", template: "price-increase", send_at: "2026-11-01")
You get
- Statement
- The agent will send the price-increase email to every address on the all-customers list on 1 November 2026.
- Status
- explicit
Check your understanding
What did the caller supply? Which parts of the result follow from that input? Where does the example leave a question open?